I'll take German quality with regards to small displacement Diesel engines any day of the week. With regular gas (petrol) -- its a different story. But Generally JoeyO, I agree with your assessment. It looks like MB used high quality pieces on the interior -- the fit and finish looks excellent. Even though it is a low dollar item car (comparatively speaking to other MB models) -- you'll still get the great Mercedes service.Quality is a very complex subject. I like to break it into two types of quality: 1) fit-finish quality and 2) reliability quality. Mercedes has a good track record with fit-finish. Plus, the pictures don't look like they cheapened things. Regarding reliability quality, it'll probably be just like every other German car's reliability. That means it'll be fine if you're under warranty but once your warranty expires expect things to break and be prepared to pay Mercedes prices to fix them. IMO, you're not going to get Honda reliability out of any of the big three German companies. But that subject that can be debated for pages and pages. The easy solution to that is to lease and always own the car while under mfr warranty.
You can buy the car and just get the extended warranty -- no need for a lease. I've never leased a vehicle myself either. I prefer to purchase, put a good amount down (at the very minimum) and stay ahead equity wise.I have never leased a car. I currently own a Toyota suv (2005). I have not had car payments for the last 3 years. My suv has 90k miles so I don't think leasing would work for me since I live 5 min from work which means O would have low miles.
Good point here, German quality still outweighs everything for me even with a diesel engineI'll take German quality with regards to small displacement Diesel engines any day of the week. With regular gas (petrol) -- its a different story. But Generally JoeyO, I agree with your assessment. It looks like MB used high quality pieces on the interior -- the fit and finish looks excellent. Even though it is a low dollar item car (comparatively speaking to other MB models) -- you'll still get the great Mercedes service.
So, I'd say spring for the extended warranty, treat your dealer right and you'll never have to worry about a thing for about 10 years![]()
Hello Manford, welcome to the site! Glad to have you aboard. How about making an introduction thread so we can learn a little bit about you?Good point here, German quality still outweighs everything for me even with a diesel engine
Actually, M-B has been working really hard to get its reliability ratings up and seems to be succeeding. For example, the current C Class gets a "Better than average" (half red circle) for predicted reliability based on thousands of owners' recent experience.Since the CLA is a new model and MB isn't the highest on consumerreports.com ratings, how will the CLA be overall as a brand new model?
How long have the new A and B Classes been on the market?The old A and B Class have exactly zero in common with the new ones, so whatever reliability record you think may go with them (my own experience is not great), it won't apply to the CLA. The new A/B/CLA are all new inside and out.
Just did itHello Manford, welcome to the site! Glad to have you aboard. How about making an introduction thread so we can learn a little bit about you?
I hope this isn't like the ML series when it just came out in 1998. The ML had neither fit-finish quality nor reliability. My relative's ML had problems from day 1, which the dealership could not fix. The original ML thought had great "ride/handling/comfort/space" combination compared to the SUVs at that time.Quality is a very complex subject. I like to break it into two types of quality: 1) fit-finish quality and 2) reliability quality.
That was an opportune time for MB to create a name for themselves w/ the SUV craze in North America as well as hardly any competition at the time (no premium/luxury SUVs from BMW & Audi, only limited selection of truck-based SUVs from Lexus & Infiniti).I hope this isn't like the ML series when it just came out in 1998. The ML had neither fit-finish quality nor reliability. My relative's ML had problems from day 1, which the dealership could not fix. The original ML thought had great "ride/handling/comfort/space" combination compared to the SUVs at that time.
Agree. On luxury SUVs at that time, your only choices were the MB ML, Lexus RX, Range Rover, Toyota Land Cruiser and I can't remember what Infiniti had. Ranger Rovers were every expensive and unreliable. Lexus RX was too girlie and still is. Land Cruiser did not seem fit in the Toyota line up given that they pushed it really up stream. So, it really was MB ML, the real SUV choice that was "reasonable" for a guy.That was an opportune time for MB to create a name for themselves w/ the SUV craze in North America as well as hardly any competition at the time (no premium/luxury SUVs from BMW & Audi, only limited selection of truck-based SUVs from Lexus & Infiniti).